Support Incontinence of the Void is available NOW

With the recent turn towards realism, the notion of transcendental subjectivity is (again) dismissed as philosophically outdated and politically harmful. Furthermore, the progress in brain sciences seems to render this notion irrelevant. But what if we still have to learn a lot from the transcendental approach? The two classes will examine how Lacan’s teaching enables us to grasp sexual difference as the constitutive feature of transcendental subjectivity, plus how recent advances in brain sciences continue to rely on transcendental presuppositions. The question to be discussed is: how will the new results of brain sciences, as well as the digitalization of our lives, affect subjectivity, especially in its political dimension?

Talk

Q&A

 

[Lecture delivered on October 4th 2017.]


Slavoj Žižek

Slavoj Žižek is a Slovenian philosopher and psychoanalyst, and a senior researcher at the Institute for Humanities, Birkbeck College, University of London. He has also been a visiting professor at more than 10 universities around the world. Žižek is the author of many books; his latest are Against the Double Blackmail and Disparities. This account is not monitored and is only maintained to give appropriate credit.

2 Comments

tayoulevy · October 12, 2017 at 1:33 pm

Very relevant question? Realism also uses is it but its organicism blinds this.Positivism bias or naiveté

tayoulevy · October 12, 2017 at 1:40 pm

THe question mark is wrongly placed. it should beat the end

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *