My short comment on the “war on terror” published online by New Statesman has triggered a series of critical reactions which definitely looks like a well-coordinated campaign, so it deserves a short reply.
With regard to the statements quoted in my text and falsely attributed to Hakan Fidan, the head of Turkish intelligence, things are simple and clear. After friends informed me about these statements, I searched for them on the web and found a couple of sites with them, plus I did not find any sites denying them. So I quoted the statements, mentioning the website where I found them. After it was discovered that these statements are false, the paragraph containing them was immediately deleted. What more could I have done with my limited resources? Furthermore, I find totally out of place the attempts to locate this accident into a series which allegedly demonstrates my “passion for plagiarism and fabrication”, and where I am accused even of plagiarising myself (in one of my columns for NYT, I used two passages from a book of mine).
But the main voice in the debate was that of Ibrahim Kalin, the spokesperson for the Turkish presidency, who published on the al Jazeera website a column on “Zizek, Turkey and intellectual frivolity” – a very strange text indeed. It attributes to me “the laughable claim that Turkey is somehow responsible for the Paris attacks” (which I never made), plus the claim that “Turkey buys oil from ISIL” (which I also never made) as well as the claim that “Turkey is fighting the Kurds fighting ISIL in Syria” (also never made by me).
[Extract. Appeared in New Statesman, on December 31st, 2015. (full text).]